|
|
|
 |

 |
28 June 1998
... continued from page 1
The authors of the reports - Rebecca Clark and Jeffrey Passel say the immigrants
each pay an average of US$6,300 (RM24,570) in taxes compared to US$6,500 (RM25,350)
by natives while the illegal immigrants pay US$2,400(RM9,360).
What about incomes? Good news: the immigrants (legal ones) earn slightly better on
the average than natives - US$18,700 (RM 72,930) against US$18,100 (RM70,590); the
illegals make on the average US$12,000 (RM46,800), slightly above that of refugees
(US$8,300 (RM32,370)). The refugees earn the lowest among the various immigrant groups
in the state of New York.
The total personal income of the immigrants was US$57.5 billion (RM224.25 billion)
or 17.4 % of the US$330 billion (US$1= RM3.9) in annual personal income earned in
New York last year and the year before that.
Of the taxes paid by immigrants 69% goes to the Federal Treasury, despite the fact
that the government services used by immigrants are increasingly funded by state
or local authorities.
Under the new law states will administer welfare progammmes themselves with block
grants from Washington D.C.
Needy families may now only receive welfare payments for up to five years under the
new Clinton programme in which most immigrants are restricted from receiving temporary,
assistance or
other federal assistance in. their first five years in the country or until they
become citizens.
There are more than one million "green card holders" in New York and more
than a million naturalized citizens. Together the two groups account for 77% of the
state's immigrant population. Some 16 % or 540,000 are illegal immigrants.
Because New York has always been vibrant and dynamic with a long history of receiving
aliens, its population is in contrast with the rest of the nation. It has a large
number of refugees and a greater number of naturalized citizens from Eastern European
nations and the former Soviet Union whereas in California and Texas, most of the
immigrants are from Mexico.
The Big Apple continues to attract people from the Caribbean, Latin America and increasingly
from South and Southeast Asia, mainly Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Filipinos,
Thais and Vietnamese.
New York is also a very popular choice with Malaysians besides the West Coast. In
recent years, 20% of the state immigrant arrivals are from South and Southeast Asia.
Immigrants account for 17 % of the New York population California has the largest
immigration population. California have a great effect on foreigners. They have come
to have their share of the "American dream". Many found it for a greater
number, the dream has become a mirage, and with the severe cuts in welfare it would
take a longer period for immigrants to get themselves on their feet in their first
years on American soil.
The benefit of a generally good education and continuing community colleges and light
classes compensates for all their troubles; besides, America to them is an equalizer:
they were attracted to New York and later to their parts of the United States by
economic opportunities denied them in their own countries.
The immigrants had ambitions to better themselves, to succeed where their ancestors
had failed.
A Malaysian couple I know has done extremely well in the real estate and letting
business. The family lives in a penthouse and all their four children attended private
schools and universities They are chasing greater wealth, and I have no doubt they
will achieve . Their two boys and two girls - second generation Americans - should
do better because they possess better education and greater opportunities.
One sad story among any tales: 49 deaf Mexican illegal immigrants, whose ordeal as
virtual "slaves" in quiet Queens neighbourhood in New York shocked Americans,
were last week allowed to stay in the United States by the Immigration Department.
They were forced to peddle trinkets in the tube (subway or underground) and turn
over their earnings to bosses who beat and abused them. They were allowed to stay
because of their help in convicting their tormentors.
Eighteen "bosses" were sentenced to varying jail terms for crimes including
conspiracy to commit slavery and harbouring illegal immigrants.
Meanwhile, Asian Americans who have done well economically and in education (a fifth
of the nation's 67,000 medical students are Asian Americans, but form only four percent
of the
overall population) feel that they need affirmative action as much as any minority
(Black and Hispanic) because whatever their accomplishments, they are often seen
as outsiders.
A good example is Dr. John Yam, a successful doctor in Seattle who arrived in the
United States three decades ago and is building a dream house, a 5000sqft contemporary
building, overlooking sparkling Lake Washington.
The dust and noise from the construction set off a dispute with a neighbour (white,
I presume) that quickly took on racial overtones.
"He told me to go back to Hong Kong," said Yam (June 20 issue of Washington
Post). The brief bent of racial bigotory reminded him that Asian Americans need affirmative
action and protection as any minority. I was surprised that Yam did not ask his white
tormentor to go back to "Poland, Yugoslavia or whatever he or his ancestors
came from" for I am sure he could not have been be a native American himself.
Most immigrants have done better than if they had remained at home even if they do
not dress in Ralph Polo or Giorgio Armani suits, shop at Saks of Fifth Avenue, eat
at Bakney's and send their children to exclusive prep schools. They could well have
stayed at home and left everything to fate. But they acted to improve themselves
and most did if they were prepared to work hard.
For potential immigrants, do remember that migration does not simply mean physically
moving to the United States. They must also be prepared to undergo a mental change
and acquire a new thinking and approach towards life, otherwise they might as well
stay put where they are.
This is also true for Malaysian students, the bumiputra, in particular. They should
not transport their life in Baling or Kok Lanas to New York, Boston or Stillwater.
The first 20 years of my life were spent at home (in Kok Lanas, Kota Baru, Kuala
Kangsar and Kuala Lumpur), then I came to the United States, first in 1960 and many
more times after that. I am now in my third year living in New York, (lived in London
and in Cambridge for five years), however, I never once, even in my darkest period
in solitary confinement during my five years thought that my world would exist somewhere
else other than home.
Dato' Abdullah Ahmad is Malaysia's Special Envoy to the United Nations
(This article has been reproduced with the kind permission of Sun )
|
|
|
|
|