21 March 1999
continue from page1
One thing, I have learned in life is that the favourites do not always win.
In politics, especially in palace intrigues, everything is fair.
The image problem, unless attended to, can grow into a fatal liability However, Najib
is a better communicator and sound bite savvy than did his dad.
Razak, too, was plagued by rumours of different nature but we confronted them head-on
by degrading it. Soon the rumour mills diminished.
We overcame it without having to be a "good provider" if you knew what
I mean. All the Razak past, and only after 23 years, has been nearly swallowed up.
Without decent and readable books - forget about a lasting and definitive judgment
- it will soon be completely forgotten.
It is sad when this happens to the man who with an unrelenting vigour conducted the
war against poverty as a personal crusade.
He knew poverty because he grew amidst it.
In the war against deprivation and degradation he never lacked power and the result
He presided (unwillingly) as Director of Operations following the May 13 incident.
He worked unceasingly and with a corresponding determination for the return to parliamentary
democracy. It was he who enlarged the Alliance Party to become Barisan Nasional in
Political memories are short. Even at the best of times people's (especially Malaysians)
could go back to only their grandparents.
A nation or a people without writing and literature will be left without history
other than legends - no documents, no texts. What our mothers tell us are not good
I am only telling you something which is true. The best kind and the sincerest form
of homage to Razak's memory is for some one credible to write a book about him as
But to understand the real Razak and not the myth, we will have to know more than
what we have learned, which is dismally little so far.
No doubt Razak was powerful but there existed in his shadow persons who wielded influence
if not power "behind the scenes."
Their power was derivative but did it matter?
I realise only after having finished this that I needn't have written this article.
Razak did not get into books, even paper backs.
Like the "Founding Father" Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, he has disappeared
in the national memory
Razak and Tunku have faded away. But I have not forgotten either because their lives
are part of my history.
No demitive books on Razak or Tunku (because there is none) except for collections
of articles (Tunku) and a collection of early speeches (Razak) are on my bookshelves.
The print and pages are fading because they used cheap paper and cheap ink.
But the subjects they both spoke are as relevant then as they are now.
I heard Razak delivered most of the collected speeches. I wrote a couple of them;
the rest by bureaucrats of various ability, commitment and integrity.
I read it, but knew of no one who had I am not altogether surprised if there were
only very few copies of it in Malaysian libraries.
I know for certain there is none in Malaysian bookshops or at the United Nations
(Tan Sri Abdullah Ahmad is our envoy to the United Nations)