Industry wide indications and ceasing film body development by Pentax altogether in early 2003 more than suggest the manual focus Pentax LX will not be having an upgrade (except, perhaps for very rare Limited Edition Models hand assembled by special commission by the new HoyaPentax Corporation). In 2008 Pentax became a division of Hoya Corporation, which had together with Pentax released jointly developed professional grade optics (since 2005); Pentax has shifted its attention to development of auto focus Digital SLRs having build qualities constructed for the long run--now with weather seals--like the LX. You may use this site for common support and sharing of mutual users knowledge or experiences among yourselves. You may also use this message board as a guestbook for the advanced users Pentax SLR cameras from the LX forward, including many such auto focus film cameras, and Pentax digital SLR cameras. We keep the site going too for the WORD SEARCH FEATURE found here as to its magnificent K mount system user archives: as have been shared here for many years. Have an inquiry related to Pentax gear? First try KEYING IN YOUR KEY WORD(S) for a preexisting archived response on your subject of inquiry from this LX site. If your inquiry or sharing is from advanced users K10D, K20D, or K200D SLR needs, proceed on to t NEW PENTAX ADVANCED USERS K10D, K20D SLR site.
This LX site was specifically created for the great Pentax LX SLR camera model(s), and now has incorporated increased opportunity for an expanded interchange with the introductions of the Pentax K10D, K20D, and K200D SLRs to include advanced and professional digital user models. Interchange is encouraged with the intention to continue as a forum for advanced system users of past K-mount film based SLR systems and the mentioned Pentax DSLRs. With decreasing forum traffic here, and enthusiasts moving on with SLR digital imaging products futures, we hope the continued convenience of this site and its past Pentax advanced LX users data archives--provided by the database KEY WORD SEARCH FEATURE found here--can be very useful to you. Most past site user techniques, systems components, and lenses of Pentax advanced applications--as have been past examined by users on this site--are still of use regarding the newest Pentax SLRs. Please don't mail us with other than constructive suggestions or to rectify mistakes found within this site, thank you. Since this is a non-profitable resource site, maintained by professional and advanced system users, the developer of this site reserves the rights to censor or delete any inappropriate, unrelated, misleading or excessively hostile messages posted herein. If your intention is to dispose of your Pentax cameras or its accompanying accessories and/or you are looking for a used model, or even for any of its system components: please use a separate section with a higher volume of related traffic for these purposes: on the Free Trade Zone site instead. The Photography In Malaysia sites sponsor has no Guestbook standing on its own, because it is an integral part of the MIR site. But if you want to leave a note on your experience of visiting our site and its service, you may use the MIR's Guestbook found at another new window by clicking on the Guestbook Link.
Add a Posting to the Message Board
A kind reminder: Please do not misuse of this message board system.
Main Index Page of Pentax LX SLR Website
The respective Message Boards are some of the HARDEST hit sections of the PIM served sites; if, at any one time, the traffic is high--the table of contents or individual pages may take a while to load your input data, or our's. So, just be patient. If your interaction stalls, just click on the 'Reload' or 'Refresh' button on your browser menu once to re-attempt interaction here. Thank you. Welcome to MIR!
1. From : Mico (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://
Date : 01:49 PM Sunday 13 November, 2005
Phil, sensor dust is something that has to be taken into account while shooting digital, at least for now. Olympus, as Jay have mentioned, is the only brand that has taken care of accumulating dust. Other than that, read Jay`s last chapter or buy another
*IST-DS to reduce the need for frequent lens change (pun). I have the same problem, but there is also the other one: while looking at my LX`s and corresponding Pentax lenses, and having my new Canon system beside I can not stop asking myself "why the heck I had to spend 4.000 US on this?" Besause I am pro and no one is asking me what gear I like or not, as long as the final result is concerned. And I`ve realised that I could not have accomplished many of my photographic task with available Pentax DSLR bodies. So, enjoy your beloved Pentax lenses on Pentax digital body and do not bother your self about dust. M.
2. From : Jay (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 09:36 AM Sunday 13 November, 2005
Sensors, static attraction of dust on such, the notion of interchangeable sensors, etc. The variables on existing and anticipated imaging quality with in-camera digital originations are legion. Although Olympus, for example, makes a brand new 8MP digital SLR with a static wave feature to clean their inboard sensor at the push of a button, the 35mm optical increase factor for this camera is 2X, not 1.5 or even 1.6X. Not good on the short optical end for past Oly 35mm camera lens owners--even with lens interchangeablity. So, new and alike livid details will take time to sort out in the applicable specifications marketplace. What will become commonly acceptable to professional quality DSLRs? Certainly we could make a large list from what is in the marketplace, but, new emerging features--say of next spring's bodies--may become the new standards for advanced users.
No, excepting the 6 X 6, 6 X 4.5, and 4 X 5 film replacement digital backs (very expensive) for existing medium and larger format cameras, there is only planned obsolescence among the current small format digital picks. Small format DSLRs prices are going down, features up, but, what will constitute professional features is still being determined by the R & D optical/electronic emerging alliances at hand. Panasonic with Matashusta (sp), Konica-Minolta with Sony, Pentax with Samsung, etc. It is sort of like examining a patient who presents with a disorder affecting his functioning, which is unclear as to cause, yet symptomatic of his population group: all the probing, sampling, and identifying won't take away the problem until the chartable trends are available over a significant timeframe for that affected population. My own concerns tell me to wait another year before buying a DSLR, even though I can tell you I would currently buy the one Mico bought as a system.
There are dedicated reasonably priced sensor cleaning products emerging: static swipe brushes, little blowers and vacuums, and lock on to lens mount cleaning units. I'd examine these and get one for sure, regarding lens changing necessity. --Jay3. From : Philip Ashman (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://
Date : 05:42 PM Saturday 12 November, 2005
As you know I recently purchased a Pentax *istds body to go with my lenses and allow me entry level to the DSLR world whilst retaining my LX (and other film cameras). I am pleased with the results I have been able to get with the *istds but have already discovered one main problem that I believe will plague photographers who choose DSLR's and was not really an issue with film.
This is the ease with which muck and dust can get onto the sensor when changing lenses outdoors, or indeed in any location with an unclean atmosphere. I live on the west coast of the UK and take a lot of my shots locally in quite often windy conditions near a beach. Despite being very careful I have already had tiny specks on my photos and have had to clean the sensor with a blower (very carefully). However, it is hit and miss if this works and if not you have to send the body off to be professionally cleaned at some nuisance and expense! Of course the only problem with film would have been a speck on the frame in question and even if a whole roll were lost its no real problem and with film you are constantly loading a new sensor (so to speak). It has got me so concerned that on many occasions now whilst out I refrain from changing lenses unless conditions are very favourable so as to avoid any chance of dust/muck getting onto the sensor! Not much use or confidence inspiring. Maybe I am being over careful?
I also wonder if any manufacturer of digital bodies is considering working towards a time when a customer would be able, having purchased an expensive top of the range digital body, to upgrade or change the sensor without having to buy a new complete body. Or will this never be practical and will they continue, as now, to churn out new models with bigger/better sensors at such a rate that no-one can keep up and like me, feel much more comfortable, happy and satisfied when using my film cameras.
Phil4. From : AB (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 04:53 PM Saturday 12 November, 2005
Yep, I use Portra a lot and have it printed on B&W paper, I like it for potraits but... Just got some Tri-X back (35mm & 6X7) and that's great, a bit more punch. Don't know if it'd work so well with an older woman but it suits this lass in her 20's. I shall be invetigating Tri-X some more.
AB5. From : Ian (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://
Date : 02:46 AM Saturday 12 November, 2005
Thanks for the advise Philip, I'll look that head up over coffee in a minute
I too love the SG-60, but only have the one. My other LX has the lovely SE-60 in it. Although if I had two SG-60's I'd be using both. I've loaded up with Tri-X and have found some nice photos already. I was hoping to cheat and use C-41 B+W, but I'm not very happy with the local Kodak stock. It's nice, but too milky for me, and a little lacking in contrast. The grain is very fine indeed and there is a good sense of sharpness. I guess I'll just have to bite the bullet and order some HC-110 from B+H and prepare the kitchen sink. I did bring my Paterson System 4 tank and a change bag with me. Just as well. Email me if anybody wants to see the machine scans from that Kodak C-41 B+W. My guess is that it would make for excellent portrait film (Anton?). -Ian
PS I've just heard that Lord Lichfield has died.6. From : Philip Ashman (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 05:52 PM Thursday 10 November, 2005
Hope you have a great time out there. I'm not very technically minded but I too use a Manfrotto 055 pro tripod and the head I chose and am very pleased with is the 450Mg, which allows me to just about get any angle I want for my shots and of course has a spirit level to assist with straight horizons/lines etc..., although I also use an SG-20 focussing screen on my LX which I wouldn't be without, as I do shoot quite a lot of buildings/structures.
Phil7. From : Ian (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://photo.ity.co.uk
Date : 10:44 AM Thursday 10 November, 2005
I'm in Daphne AL (at last!). Managed to get the Spotmatic serviced before I came out here. It's working well (thanks to Robin at Harrow). I'm using it with it's lovely Super Tak 50mm f/1.4 as my happy snapper with rolls of Kodak C-41 B+W (Walmart!). I've just put the first roll through Walmart only to find out they only do pearl finish prints, which I hate (I'm a glossy person). So I'll be trying the local Ritz store (across the road on 98) for the next roll unless you have any suggestions. I'm hoping to get some good atmospheric post Katrina shots. Although for the serious stuff I think I'll fall-back on my usual stock (Tri-X etc.) and use the kitchen sink.
I'm also looking forward to doing some of my standard night stuff too with the LX's. And as such need some advise on Manfrotto heads. I couldn't find the space to pack my usual mammoth Manfrotto (what with bring both LX's and a full array of glass AND my one of my mountain bikes!) so I thought I'd get an 055CL/Pro (3021?) and a head from B+H Photo. I think the last time I used one (and I liked it) I used a 3047 head, but I'm not sure. Any advise on head choice would be most welcome. - Ian.8. From : Mico (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 07:57 AM Thursday 10 November, 2005
Pat, I have sent you another e-mail, I hope you will get it. Yes, my netscape.net e-mail address is useless. M.9. From : Pat (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://
Date : 06:31 AM Thursday 10 November, 2005
Mico, my email to you has just bounced back undelivered!10. From : Pat (email@example.com)PAGE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217
Url : http://
Date : 06:23 AM Thursday 10 November, 2005
Mico, reponse to my post noted. Thanks. I have sent you an email.
Try my email again, the address was typed wrong previously.
Maintainers for Pentax LX Series SLR Camera Models Message Board:
Tony Davies-Patrick (Globetrotter) (firstname.lastname@example.org); Mico Smiljanic (email@example.com);
Jay Hart (firstname.lastname@example.org); Philip Ashman (email@example.com)
| Post a Message to the Message Board |
Archived Messages of Previous Postings
001-050 | 051-100 | 101-150 | 151-200
Back to Main Index Page of
Pentax LX SLR Camera Website
Back to Message Board of
Pentax LX SLR Camera
for New/Used photographic equipment
on Pentax LX SLR camera
Home - Photography in Malaysia
Copyright © 2007. leofoo @. MIR Web Development Team.
Version three Re-Programmed by our in-house Fairuz Sulaiman, improved from original version by Ang Seng Leong ,Yeak Ngai Siew, Rizal Yahya, Halimaton Yahya (Members of the MIR Web Development Team)
MIR Guestbook On-line. Developed & Copyright@ 2001 by MIR Communications Sdn. Bhd.