Industry wide indications and ceasing film body development by Pentax altogether in early 2003 more than suggest the manual focus Pentax LX will not be having an upgrade (except, perhaps for very rare Limited Edition Models hand assembled by special commission by the new HoyaPentax Corporation). In 2008 Pentax became a division of Hoya Corporation, which had together with Pentax released jointly developed professional grade optics (since 2005); Pentax has shifted its attention to development of auto focus Digital SLRs having build qualities constructed for the long run--now with weather seals--like the LX. You may use this site for common support and sharing of mutual users knowledge or experiences among yourselves. You may also use this message board as a guestbook for the advanced users Pentax SLR cameras from the LX forward, including many such auto focus film cameras, and Pentax digital SLR cameras. We keep the site going too for the WORD SEARCH FEATURE found here as to its magnificent K mount system user archives: as have been shared here for many years. Have an inquiry related to Pentax gear? First try KEYING IN YOUR KEY WORD(S) for a preexisting archived response on your subject of inquiry from this LX site. If your inquiry or sharing is from advanced users K10D, K20D, or K200D SLR needs, proceed on to t NEW PENTAX ADVANCED USERS K10D, K20D SLR site.
This LX site was specifically created for the great Pentax LX SLR camera model(s), and now has incorporated increased opportunity for an expanded interchange with the introductions of the Pentax K10D, K20D, and K200D SLRs to include advanced and professional digital user models. Interchange is encouraged with the intention to continue as a forum for advanced system users of past K-mount film based SLR systems and the mentioned Pentax DSLRs. With decreasing forum traffic here, and enthusiasts moving on with SLR digital imaging products futures, we hope the continued convenience of this site and its past Pentax advanced LX users data archives--provided by the database KEY WORD SEARCH FEATURE found here--can be very useful to you. Most past site user techniques, systems components, and lenses of Pentax advanced applications--as have been past examined by users on this site--are still of use regarding the newest Pentax SLRs. Please don't mail us with other than constructive suggestions or to rectify mistakes found within this site, thank you. Since this is a non-profitable resource site, maintained by professional and advanced system users, the developer of this site reserves the rights to censor or delete any inappropriate, unrelated, misleading or excessively hostile messages posted herein. If your intention is to dispose of your Pentax cameras or its accompanying accessories and/or you are looking for a used model, or even for any of its system components: please use a separate section with a higher volume of related traffic for these purposes: on the Free Trade Zone site instead. The Photography In Malaysia sites sponsor has no Guestbook standing on its own, because it is an integral part of the MIR site. But if you want to leave a note on your experience of visiting our site and its service, you may use the MIR's Guestbook found at another new window by clicking on the Guestbook Link.
Add a Posting to the Message Board
A kind reminder: Please do not misuse of this message board system.
Main Index Page of Pentax LX SLR Website
The respective Message Boards are some of the HARDEST hit sections of the PIM served sites; if, at any one time, the traffic is high--the table of contents or individual pages may take a while to load your input data, or our's. So, just be patient. If your interaction stalls, just click on the 'Reload' or 'Refresh' button on your browser menu once to re-attempt interaction here. Thank you. Welcome to MIR!
1. From : Mico (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 01:16 PM Friday 19 August, 2005
I had SMC Pentax-K 135-600/6.7 ("A" or "M" version does not exist) for some time and I gave up using it for the reasons Tony mentioned bellow. Very good glass, but extremely difficult to handle and slow to work with. Monopod is out of question, only high-end tripod and ball head, to repeat after Tony again. On the other hand, it is a bargain compared to 250-600/5.6. M.2. From : GLOBETROTTER (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://www.gallery.globetrotterworld.co.uk
Date : 04:16 PM Thursday 18 August, 2005
The Pentax SMC zoom 135mm-600mm f/6.7 is a great lens, but it is also very long (582mm!) and very heavy at 4070gm. Not only that, but coupled with the fairly slow maximum aperture and slow manual zooming and handling, I would steer you away from using it on a monopod (The heavier - and sharper - but much shorter F* or FA* 250-600mm f/5.6 EDIF lenses are far easier to use, but even with them I would advise you to mainly use a tripod and rarely a monopod, unless you are shooting in very bright light conditions).
It would be possible to use monopod if you used fast film, but to maintain quality I would use a slow-medium speed film matched with a sturdy tripod and pro-level ballhead. This is not a lightweight trekking option, but I assure you that the end results will justify you carrying a good tripod instead of a monopod. If you really need to cut down on weight, then try the Manfrotto Nat (nature/trekking) tripod legs matched with a Manfrotto pro-ball head - an extremely lightweight yet stable combination.3. From : Mico (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 04:10 AM Saturday 13 August, 2005
Jay, I am back to Montreal (month ago) and I`ve got your e-mail but my browser does not work properly. I will write as soon as I get
it fixed. M.4. From : Jay (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://
Date : 01:48 AM Friday 12 August, 2005
So,What is the ideal follow focus nature and wildlife zoom? That depends on the format one is using. A good review of the AF Tokina ATXII 100-300mm, which can become over a 600mm with the A sized digital sensor and a 1.4X converter is found at http://www.naturephotographers.net/jh0400-1.html. My previous comments were on the 35mm use ATX origial 100-300mmf4, usually found as a bargain--around $200.00--on ebay. This lens is known for accurate color and sharpness, and is adaptable by teleconverters. Because it is an internal focus optical design, follow focus is excellent FYI. --Jay5. From : Jay (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 11:07 PM Tuesday 09 August, 2005
Yes, and I forgot to mention that the lens of question is neither an M or A series, but a non-automatic iris, K series, adding one more factor to careful and slow shooting in the field.
--Jay6. From : Jay (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://www.imagedispatch.com
Date : 11:42 AM Tuesday 09 August, 2005
Dan, Lugging such a a monster for location use is what it was made for, but, compared to say the 250-600mm f 5.6 FA (going on e-bay last week for $4,100, i.e. a bargain in excellent shape), coupled with the current Pentax D system fast autofocus response, one must decide if one is going to primarily approach nature the active or the comtemplative way. Use, your own shooting style, whether or not you are trekking and climbing with other backpacking gear (without support of a pack animal or ATV)--All will say what works for you. I've never seen the lens, but once considered it, read reviews, and then did not consider it. A massive tripod would be needed. A Tokina ATX A series, 100-300mm true f4, with a 1.4X converter, would be very fieldable at 5.6 all the way to 420mm (with a 2x converter, at f8 to 600mm too, but then, like the lens you mentioned, requiring much daylight, support, and altitude for it). If going to autofocus, a like Sigma true 100-300mm f4 will prove fieldable (but lack the color rendering of the Tokina). When we get much longer than 400mm with old, non internal focusing lenses, it becomes both the active and the contemplative way using these in the field. Setup, follow-focus, subject framing and the like become as much chance victories as lens achievements. It may be better to peddle that lens and buy what is suggested for accurate and very good zoom work. Globetrotter too may have thoughts on the matter. --Jay7. From : Dan (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 05:01 AM Tuesday 09 August, 2005
Not too long ago there was some discussion about the 400mm and 600mm lens and keeping them steady. I plan on taking a 135mm - 600mm f5.6 A( or M) series zoom (which is a monster) out into the wilderness. I think the weight is a big advantage for holding it steady, even though it is tough to pack. I thought I would try using a monopod. Is this reasonable or wishful thinking? Dan8. From : Jay (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Url : http://www.imagedispatch.com
Date : 12:57 AM Saturday 06 August, 2005
AB, Thanks, Topo was a Typo indeed. As for the reference to the 28-70mm f2.8 Pentax, this was produced as an FA lens, not an A series lens. So the reference was clarified, for, unless one spells out all technical reference names and details accurately it may confuse readers. --Jay9. From : AB (email@example.com)
Url : http://
Date : 02:43 AM Friday 05 August, 2005
Hi Jay. Well I assume topo is meant to be typo (so that was kind of double typo!). This bit '28-70 f2.8 FA is indicated, not A series but FA series' has me stumped... maybe it's me. :-)10. From : Jay (firstname.lastname@example.org)PAGE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217
Url : http://
Date : 01:08 PM Thursday 04 August, 2005
AB, Can you be more descriptive? You lost me on your comment. --Jay
Maintainers for Pentax LX Series SLR Camera Models Message Board:
Tony Davies-Patrick (Globetrotter) (email@example.com); Mico Smiljanic (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Jay Hart (email@example.com); Philip Ashman (firstname.lastname@example.org)
| Post a Message to the Message Board |
Archived Messages of Previous Postings
001-050 | 051-100 | 101-150 | 151-200
Back to Main Index Page of
Pentax LX SLR Camera Website
Back to Message Board of
Pentax LX SLR Camera
for New/Used photographic equipment
on Pentax LX SLR camera
Home - Photography in Malaysia
Copyright © 2007. leofoo @. MIR Web Development Team.
Version three Re-Programmed by our in-house Fairuz Sulaiman, improved from original version by Ang Seng Leong ,Yeak Ngai Siew, Rizal Yahya, Halimaton Yahya (Members of the MIR Web Development Team)
MIR Guestbook On-line. Developed & Copyright@ 2001 by MIR Communications Sdn. Bhd.